04273cam a2200529 i 4500 24088627 20250607133028.7 m |o d | cr ||||||||||| 250314s2017 cauab ob 000 0 eng 24088627 0 cbc origcop u ncip 20 y-gencatlg acquire policy default 2024739583 9780833098993 (pbk) 0833098993 (pbk) RAND/RR-2099-NIJ DLC eng rda pn DLC n-us--- HV8139 363.2/30973 23 Jackson, Brian A., 1972- author. Knowing more, but accomplishing what? : developing approaches to measure the effects of information-sharing on criminal justice outcomes / Brian A. Jackson, Lane F. Burgette, Caroline Stevens, Claude Messan Setodji, Erinn Herberman, Stephanie Ann Kovalchik, Katie Mugg, Meagan Cahill, Jessica Hwang, Joshua Lawrence Traub. Santa Monica, Calif. : RAND, [2017] 1 online resource (xix, 53 pages) : illustrations. text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier "The research reported here was conducted in the RAND Justice Policy Program, which ... is part of RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment"--Preface. Also available on the Internet as a PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (pages 49-53). Introduction -- How Can We Measure the Effects of Information-Sharing? -- Developing and Testing Measures with the Automated Regional Justice Information System -- Conclusions -- Appendix: User Interview Questions. Unrestricted online access Information-sharing became a central element of the policy debate about U.S. homeland and national security after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. However, sharing of information across jurisdictional lines is just as important for everyday criminal justice efforts to prevent and investigate crime, and systems to provide such capabilities have been in place for many years. Despite widespread belief that information-sharing is valuable, there have been relatively limited efforts to measure its effect on criminal justice outcomes. To help address this need, we examined the measurement of information-sharing effects from the strategic to the tactical levels, with a focus on developing reliable measurements that capture the range of ways sharing can affect outcomes and how the practicalities of law enforcement work practices can affect measurement. In collaboration with an advanced regional information-sharing agency, we developed techniques to examine the effects of multiple types of data-sharing at the officer, case, and offender levels. Analyses showed significant correlations between different types of sharing on the level of interagency involvement in cases for individual offenders, on the timing and likelihood of specific law enforcement events, and on the likelihood of individual police officers to be involved in cross-jurisdictional arrests. In addition, we explored lessons for future policy evaluation and information system design to facilitate measurement. This is non-restricted, fully open content that may be accessed on and off of the Library of Congress campus, with no restrictions, by an unlimited number of users Description based on print version record; resource not viewed. Law enforcement United States. Domestic intelligence United States. Communication in law enforcement United States. Criminal justice, Administration of United States. Rand Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment (Organization). Justice Policy Program. Rand Corporation. National Institute of Justice (U.S.) Print Version: Knowing more, but accomplishing what? Santa Monica, Calif. : RAND, [2017] 9780833098993 (DLC) 2018303497 gdcebookspublic 2024739583 https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gdc/gdcebookspublic.2024739583 gdc/scd gdc/usgovdigresources